Skip to main content

Long-lived roots of trust

A firmware or trust root that cannot update its signature check later has to be designed for a post-quantum signature now, if it will still be in use when a cryptanalytically relevant quantum computer exists.

What can go wrong​

A general-purpose stateful scheme without a way to control the state, or a root of trust left on a signature the device can never replace.

A stronger practice​

NIST IR 8547, October 2026, says that in those cases the devices should be designed to require quantum-resistant signatures on the executable code. It says stateful hash-based schemes, LMS and XMSS in SP 800-208, are not for general use because the signer must never use a one-time key twice, and that they may be useful for software and firmware signing.

The UK NCSC timelines, modified 3 August 2026, list LMS and XMSS as algorithms with a more limited set of uses, and the 2028 plan row includes long-lived hardware roots of trust.

SLH-DSA is the stateless hash-based signature. It is named here and does not have its own page. This edition does not link FIPS 205 and does not reprint parameters.

Secure OTA updates is the update path this book does not re-explain. That link is not the authority for the post-quantum clock.

What to ask​

Can this device update its verifier in the field?

Evidence​

The product decision, the lifetime, and the algorithm family, written down.

A weak answer​

"We will patch the boot check later."

A stronger answer​

"This product cannot update the verifier. The 2028 plan includes the root of trust. We are using a firmware-signing construction the cited guidance allows, and we have said how state is controlled if the scheme is stateful."

Which pass​

The UK NCSC 2028 plan row includes long-lived hardware roots of trust. The product decision, the lifetime, and the algorithm family are written down in that early plan.

Options​

NIST IR 8547 allows stateful hash-based schemes, LMS and XMSS, for software and firmware signing, and says they are not for general use because the signer must never use a one-time key twice. The NCSC timelines list LMS and XMSS as algorithms with a more limited set of uses. SLH-DSA is the stateless hash-based signature and stays on this page. Who defends the choice is the authority you write next to the product decision.

Sources​

  • NIST IR 8547, Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards, October 2026. NIST IR 8547
  • UK NCSC, Timelines for migration to post-quantum cryptography, modified 3 August 2026. Timelines